Asus G73Sw

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus G73Sw (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G73Sw
Memory	6.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110113
Uptime	4.9 Days
Run Date	Jun 10 '20 at 19:37
Run Duration	188 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$199 39,605 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 81.4 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 138 59% 96.5 Pts	4-Core 254 8-Core 346 38% 300 Pts	64-Core 345 21% 345 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 460M 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Asus(1043 2048) 1.5GB CLim: 675 MHz, MLim: 625 MHz, Ram: 1.5GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.12% Terrible	Lighting 8.07 Reflection 9.62 Parallax 6.72 7% 8.13 fps	MRender 10.7 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 10.7 8% 9.92 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.12% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel X25-M 80GB 12,660 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 13GB free Firmware: 2CV1 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,814 Write 5242 Mixed 4,222 995% 4,426 MB/s	4K Read 481 4K Write 403 4K Mixed 421 1,482% 435 MB/s	DQ Read 1,530 DQ Write 1,266 DQ Mixed 1390 1,043% 1,395 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 44%
Seagate Momentus 2.5" 750GB (2010)-$70 21,848 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 3,794 Write 5,210 Mixed 4,244 3,323% 4,416 MB/s	4K Read 416 4K Write 340 4K Mixed 30.8 27,063% 262 MB/s	DQ Read 1,387 DQ Write 1,120 DQ Mixed 1,264 11,559% 1,257 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
SABRENT 1TB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 715GB free, PID 1561 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 24.5 Mixed 17.9 SusWrite 23.1 31% 23.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 293%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 8502 PSD38G13332S 8502 PSD38G13332S 80CE M471B5773CHS-CH9 20GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 8192, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	45.7% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 16.9 MC Mixed 14.7 45% 15.7 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 13 SC Mixed 13.8 38% 13.4 GB/s	Latency 77.9 51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G73Sw Builds (Compare 160 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G73Sw

CPU
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	159x
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GTX 460MNvidiaBench 6%, 3,887 samples	160x

SSD
LMT-256M6M mSATA 256GBLiteonitBench 73%, 4,013 samples	5x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	3x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 318 samples	24x
EBJ21UE8BFU0-DJ-F 4x2GBUnknownBench 42%, 289 samples	19x
M471B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 41%, 10,285 samples	14x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $199

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16