Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	73.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock B365M Phantom Gaming 4 (all builds)
Memory	11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190109
Uptime	18.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 09 '20 at 07:59
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	Memory 94 1-Core 131 2-Core 260 90% 161 Pts	4-Core 512 8-Core 753 79% 632 Pts	64-Core 768 48% 768 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143 230,793 User benchmarks, average bench 68% MSI(1462 3792) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.66 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	73.9% Very good	Lighting 98.1 Reflection 86.7 Parallax 75.4 80% 86.7 fps	MRender 69.7 Gravity 79.4 Splatting 77.2 62% 75.4 fps
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 73%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFA15.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 139 201 117 228 175 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.6% Below average	Read 264 Write 106 Mixed 91.9 SusWrite 194 36% 164 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 17.7 4K Mixed 10.4 45% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14.5 DQ Write 15.5 DQ Mixed 14.6 11% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 36.6% Great: 102%
TOSHIBA-TR200 480GB 11,560 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 288GB free Firmware: SBFA13.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 426 248 131 130 131 132 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 446 Write 231 Mixed 331 SusWrite 200 67% 302 MB/s	4K Read 21.5 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 24.4 93% 33.5 MB/s	DQ Read 259 DQ Write 303 DQ Mixed 181 164% 248 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 102%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1.5TB free, PID b208 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 129 131 132 132 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Read 150 Write 146 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 131 145% 112 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 42% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 2666 2OZ 2x8GB 6,330 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	MC Read 34.9 MC Write 34 MC Mixed 24.2 89% 31 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 32.6 SC Mixed 26.7 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 59.7 67% 59.7 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 90%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 81%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 92%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 67%

Battle cruiser

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	127x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	114x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	111x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	65x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	55x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	95x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	50x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	45x

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $544

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16