Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive84.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 07 '20 at 13:51
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$136
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Memory 78.7
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
96% 179 Pts
4-Core 605
8-Core 1,057
100% 831 Pts
64-Core 1,472
91% 1,472 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$22
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900BB3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 35 134 116 34 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
84.5% Excellent
Read 410
Write 415
Mixed 379
SusWrite 126
75% 333 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 42.6
154% 55.7 MB/s
DQ Read 254
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 207
178% 260 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 91%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
26GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 419
105% 471 MB/s
4K Read 47.3
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 64.2
218% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 357
270% 362 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$56
30GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 67 67 65 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Read 119
Write 11
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 66.8
48% 64.7 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 1.9
420% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 70%
HGST HTS 725050A7E630 500GB
293GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 37.7
Write 35.2
Mixed 34
SusWrite 36.2
49% 35.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$66
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.3% Very good
MC Read 29.5
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 29
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 23.6
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 29.5
70% 24.4 GB/s
Latency 83
48% 83 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,626 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback