Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP xw8600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	63% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A98h
Memory	59.4 GB free of 64.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 06 '20 at 22:57
Run Duration	194 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5450 569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	47.4% Average	Memory 63 1-Core 43.2 2-Core 83.5 40% 63.2 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 337 30% 255 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% EVGA(3842 6163) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63% Good	Lighting 78.4 Reflection 79.2 Parallax 76.2 64% 77.9 fps	MRender 72.2 Gravity 74.1 Splatting 76.7 61% 74.3 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
LSI Logical Volume 238GB 13 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 168GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 359 154 130 92 91 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 90%
SanDisk Ultra Fit 123GB 3,622 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 102GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 126 Write 69.7 Mixed 81.5 109% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 3 199% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 37%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 30GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 24 24 26 24 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Read 135 Write 29.2 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 25.3 72% 64.5 MB/s	4K Read 12.3 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 10.5 780% 11.3 MB/s	DQ Read 15.7 DQ Write 17.8 DQ Mixed 12.4 1,085% 15.3 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 90%
SABRENT SD 2GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 0749 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3.9 5.2 5.4 4.3 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Read 3 Write 1 Mixed 2 SusWrite 4.5 4% 2.62 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 3% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 7%
Samsung FIT USB 3.0 32GB-$27 3,642 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 24GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 16 20 15 16 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	9.82% Terrible	Read 32.7 Write 13.7 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 16.7 26% 21.2 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.7 78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 9.82% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 97GB 93 User benchmarks, average bench 26% null MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 33792 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.2 MC Write 6.4 MC Mixed 8.9 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 3 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.13 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical xw8600 Workstation Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: HP xw8600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples	21x
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples	17x
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	11x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	9x
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples	9x

SSD
870 QVO 2TBSamsung $145Bench 102%, 41,734 samples	9x
870 EVO 250G 250GBSamsungBench 92%, 167 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $35Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	4x

RAM
49GBUnknownBench 18%, 1,461 samples	46x
65GBUnknownBench 19%, 1,017 samples	37x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $204

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $299	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $147
Intel Core i5-12400F $112	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400