Today's hottest deals

Asus P6X58D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P6X58D-E  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20101116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '17 at 21:03
Run Duration251 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$217
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 97.5
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 192
76% 129 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 222
29% 220 Pts
64-Core 206
13% 206 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.53
Relative performance (0th percentile)
25% Poor
Lighting 46.5
Reflection 40.5
Parallax 32.3
38% 39.8 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 25%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD2001FASS-00U0B0 2TB
386GB free
Firmware: 01.00101 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 139
Write 118
Mixed 131
97% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 3.38
4K Mixed 0.37
139% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
324GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 145
Write 112
Mixed 109
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.85
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.29
108% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 76%
Generic- SD/MMC 4GB
4GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Read 8.3
Write 6.08
Mixed 6.75
9% 7.04 MB/s
4K Read 2.9
4K Write 0.02
4K Mixed 0.02
12% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
50% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 13.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 48.3
83% 48.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 50%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P6X58D-E Builds (Compare 1,390 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P6X58D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $424
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback