Asus P5NT WS

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 55% Yacht	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5NT WS (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080303
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '17 at 15:18
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.75 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	45.7% Average	Memory 73.7 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 63.2 39% 56.1 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 107 14% 106 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB Ram: 2GB, Driver: 341.44 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	34.7% Below average	Lighting 42.6 Reflection 39.3 Parallax 50.8 35% 44.3 fps	MRender 56.2 Gravity 37.4 Splatting 36.8 35% 43.5 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39 62,883 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: X411 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.1% Average	Read 232 Write 136 Mixed 143 38% 170 MB/s	4K Read 27.5 4K Write 37.9 4K Mixed 12.1 77% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 89.2 DQ Write 51.8 DQ Mixed 28.1 32% 56.4 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 43.1% Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2015)-$40 52,322 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 36GB free Firmware: 01.0 Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 98.5 Write 97.5 Mixed 93.8 73% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.96 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.18 98% 1.06 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 87%
WDC WD20 EZRX-00D8PB0 2TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 334GB free, PID 0539 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 25.4 Write 25.4 Mixed 23.2 32% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.27 81% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 49%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 5.1 MC Mixed 4 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 4.4 SC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.27 GB/s	Latency 93 43% 93 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5NT WS Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 55%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5NT WS

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	3x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	2x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 580Nvidia $450Bench 23%, 15,395 samples	2x
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples	2x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	1x

SSD
STRIPE 476.94G 512GBNvidiaBench 60%, 11 samples	2x
X150 120GBEmtecBench 64%, 886 samples	2x
X1 50 120GBEmtecBench 57%, 14 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	2x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 20% - Poor

Total price: $560

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16