| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 11.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus Maximus Extreme (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.9 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20080723 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Jun 05 '20 at 17:04 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
50.3%
Above average
|
42% 61.2 Pts
|
18% 137 Pts
|
8% 130 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 6950-$290
XFX(1682 3127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
|
19.2%
Very poor
|
22% 24.6 fps
|
14% 16.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 38 19 21 25 19 MB/s
|
11.8%
Very poor
|
10% 45.4 MB/s
|
23% 5.93 MB/s
| |
|
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 116 103 105 110 109 MB/s
|
52.5%
Above average
|
52% 71.8 MB/s
|
111% 0.87 MB/s
| |
|
Intenso Slim Line 32GB
29GB free, PID 2000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 12 12 12 12 14 MB/s
|
11.3%
Very poor
|
32% 24.3 MB/s
|
100% 1.87 MB/s
| |
|
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
760GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 22 22 21 22 22 MB/s
|
15.7%
Very poor
|
34% 25.5 MB/s
|
95% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR
|
22.2%
Poor
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
18% 6.47 GB/s
|
47% 85.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Maximus Extreme Builds (Compare 45 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus Maximus Extreme
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 20x |
| Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples | 10x |
| Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 3x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 6x |
| GTX 760Nvidia $209Bench 26%, 161,132 samples | 4x |
| GTX 560Nvidia $180Bench 14%, 23,273 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $253 |