Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.84% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory7GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 7GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 7 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display800 x 600 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110608
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 05 '20 at 09:01
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
45.3% Average
Memory 67.3
1-Core 43.2
2-Core 84.6
42% 65 Pts
4-Core 137
8-Core 142
18% 139 Pts
64-Core 147
9% 147 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.3%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 4.35
Parallax 4.72
4% 4.55 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 3.87
Splatting 6.13
4% 4.73 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
344GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1AJ100E4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 75 105 101 71 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Read 122
Write 135
Mixed 66
SusWrite 79.6
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1.1
182% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 77%
UDisk2.0 Gigastone 16GB
11GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 4.1 3.8 3.9 4.1 2.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
3.95% Terrible
Read 13.7
Write 3.5
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 3.8
7% 6.62 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.95%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 7GB
null MHz
1024, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
22% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 7.3
21% 7.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 6.7
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 22%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A75M-UD2H Builds (Compare 41 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A75M-UD2H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $116
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback