Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320I-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320I-K  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 03 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 84
1-Core 155
2-Core 307
98% 182 Pts
4-Core 598
8-Core 1,101
102% 850 Pts
64-Core 1,480
92% 1,480 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Pro WX 5100
AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1086 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 16.6
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
19% Very poor
Lighting 19.5
Reflection 37.7
Parallax 27.6
16% 28.2 fps
MRender 39.2
Gravity 19.4
Splatting 32.7
25% 30.4 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SE20Q-500 500GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM52.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 875 877 881 880 873 880 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,029
Write 887
Mixed 890
SusWrite 878
207% 921 MB/s
4K Read 59.9
4K Write 219
4K Mixed 79.9
309% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 889
DQ Mixed 485
413% 586 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 218%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 36.9
93% 32.5 GB/s
SC Read 27
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 37.4
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 73.4
54% 73.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320I-K Builds (Compare 227 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320I-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback