Asus H97M-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus H97M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 20:12
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4690-$51
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 112
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 396
49% 376 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)-$15
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
3.76% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 6.77
Parallax 6.66
3% 5.83 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 2.4
Splatting 8.09
5% 5.35 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.76%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$51
787GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 74 61 127 128 138 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
79% Very good
Read 169
Write 144
Mixed 98
SusWrite 106
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 79%
Great: 108%
ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
260GB free, PID 5106
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 37 36 3.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 35
Write 33
Mixed 26.7
SusWrite 22
39% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
47% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-057.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 8.7
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.47 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.37 GB/s
Latency 72.7
55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-PLUS Builds (Compare 990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-PLUS - $111

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $358
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback