Asus K55VJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.02% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus K55VJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K55VJ
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 13:43
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Memory 81.1
1-Core 71.6
2-Core 121
57% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 162
8-Core 183
23% 173 Pts
64-Core 198
12% 198 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 635M
Asus(1043 1447) 2GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.5850
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
4.02% Terrible
Lighting 4.93
Reflection 5.81
Parallax 3.91
4% 4.88 fps
MRender 6.62
Gravity 5.17
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.12 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.02%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
185GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 117 134 116 122 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 354
Write 343
Mixed 326
SusWrite 134
65% 289 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 12.9
44% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 174
DQ Mixed 159
136% 201 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 88%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
289GB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 20 19 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.3% Poor
Read 26.8
Write 21.8
Mixed 21.6
SusWrite 19
30% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
165% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 21.3%
Great: 52%
Verbatim STORE N GO 16GB
3GB free, PID 3600
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 5.5 6.2 5.7 5.5 5.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
3.86% Terrible
Read 13.8
Write 3.3
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 5.7
7% 6.57 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CK0 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
54% Above average
MC Read 20.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.7
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 15.2
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 78.4
51% 78.4 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 54%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K55VJ Builds (Compare 350 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus K55VJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $80
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback