HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.68% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 86C9
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191220
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 22:47
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1005G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69% Good
Memory 82.2
1-Core 128
2-Core 211
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 323
8-Core 323
43% 323 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
HP(103C 86C9) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
6.68% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 8.38
Parallax 7.03
6% 7.56 fps
MRender 6.9
Gravity 7.33
Splatting 13.9
8% 9.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.68%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg30zmv256g KIOXIA 256GB
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ADHA0102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 721
Write 639
Mixed 671
151% 677 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 132
4K Mixed 67.3
229% 82.6 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 520
DQ Mixed 551
422% 575 MB/s
Poor: 70% Great: 152%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 720GB
254GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 348 315 321 319 320 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.2% Above average
Read 303
Write 307
Mixed 280
SusWrite 285
66% 294 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 34.7
4K Mixed 21.9
73% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 154
DQ Write 112
DQ Mixed 142
104% 136 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 58%
SDXC Card 64GB
9GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 18 19 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
9.96% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 14.7
Mixed 16.7
SusWrite 18.6
23% 17.5 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
89% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 9.96%
Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260NA78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.5
MC Mixed 11.8
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.4
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 15s-fq1xxx Builds (Compare 1,013 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 15s-fq1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback