HP Presario C300 (RT150EA#ABU)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	30.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Presario C300 (RT150EA#ABU) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30C6
Memory	0.1 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20060814
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 19 '17 at 17:24
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel T1300 47 User benchmarks, average bench 27% U1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	27% Poor	Memory 52.1 1-Core 14.1 2-Core 12.7 22% 26.3 Pts	4-Core 14.1 8-Core 12.8 2% 13.5 Pts	64-Core 11.9 1% 11.9 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 78GB free (System drive) Firmware: 60AABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 32540055 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 56951266345318 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 140 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 44 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 43 52 60132950059 (C2) HDA temperature 43 52 60132950059 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 32540055 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 32540055 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 32540055 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 4294967296 (E9) Unknown 0 0 1492 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2895 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2895 (F2) Unknown 0 0 4533 (F4) Unknown 100 100 1376267	30.5% Below average	Read 131 Write 106 Mixed 115 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 16.1 4K Write 28.7 4K Mixed 11.3 54% 18.7 MB/s	DQ Read 73.1 DQ Write 45.1 DQ Mixed 23 27% 47.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 73%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABD050 500GB 15 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 452GB free, PID 022b Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 31.7 Write 25.4 Mixed 14.4 28% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.2 56% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1GB 4,189 User benchmarks, average bench 13% null MHz 512, 1024 MB Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.7% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 2.4 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.4 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 1.8 SC Mixed 0.1 2% 0.7 GB/s	Latency 153 26% 153 ns
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.7% Great: 43%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP Presario C300 (RT150EA#ABU)

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)