Lenovo 20250

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20250  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Durian 7A1
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140512
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '17 at 13:46
Run Duration188 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4200M-$39
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 34.4
2-Core 79.6
46% 66.8 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 230
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 3809) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.14.4578
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2% Terrible
Lighting 2.03
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 3.47
2% 3 fps
MRender 4.19
Gravity 1.23
Splatting 4.13
3% 3.18 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LVD3 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
32.7% Below average
Read 74.6
Write 38.2
Mixed 76.8
48% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.06
4K Write 4.97
4K Mixed 0.42
141% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 63%
MMC Card 16GB
9GB free, PID 6366
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
5.72% Terrible
Read 13.6
Write 13.1
Mixed 12.6
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.68
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
14% 1.24 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.72%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
31.3% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.93 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 31.3%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20250 Builds (Compare 379 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $262
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback