Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '17 at 14:30
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 97
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
85% 148 Pts
4-Core 385
8-Core 574
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 572
35% 572 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 378.49
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 111
Reflection 113
Parallax 96.8
90% 107 fps
MRender 97.5
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 101
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo mSATA 500GB
375GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT41B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 499
Write 347
Mixed 350
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 47.1
4K Mixed 20.4
97% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 80
100% 180 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 119%
ST5000AS0011-1L5178 5TB
265GB free
Firmware: CC44 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
8.57% Terrible
Read 60
Write 74.5
Mixed 55.1
14% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.17
4K Write 9.31
4K Mixed 0.29
6% 3.25 MB/s
DQ Read 1.28
DQ Write 2.53
DQ Mixed 0.36
1% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 8.57%
Great: 17%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149
5.5TB free
Firmware: DN02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$120
995GB free
Firmware: AR13 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
42% Average
Read 75.1
Write 70.8
Mixed 36.1
45% 60.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.14
4K Write 2.33
4K Mixed 0.1
61% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 42%
Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$75
231GB free
Firmware: CC26 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
47.3% Average
Read 86.5
Write 78.4
Mixed 90.2
64% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.23
57% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
61.8% Good
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 21
MC Mixed 19.1
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 20.2
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 50.3
80% 50.3 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 61.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD3H Builds (Compare 1,580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD3H - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $700
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $120
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback