HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1497
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150324
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 16:17
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 90.7
2-Core 180
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 334
45% 337 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K600
HP(103C 094B) 1GB
CLim: 875 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 3.77
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 3.81
3% 3.85 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 6.91
5% 5.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
117GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P190710b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 427 432 437 435 435 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
89.3% Excellent
Read 445
Write 436
Mixed 407
SusWrite 432
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 56.6
4K Mixed 33.7
120% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 238
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 132
111% 165 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 89.3%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$28
248GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 110 109 110 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 112
Write 101
Mixed 54.3
SusWrite 108
69% 94.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 500GB
181GB free, PID 9561
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.3 5.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
2.17% Terrible
Read 5
Write 4.7
Mixed 5
SusWrite 5.2
7% 4.97 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.17%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4M1 Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.9% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 16
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC Builds (Compare 1,145 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6200 Pro MT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $278
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback