Acer Aspire A315-53

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A315-53  (all builds)
MotherboardKBL Metapod_KL
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 24 '20 at 20:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3867U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
47.7% Average
Memory 76.8
1-Core 49.2
2-Core 102
48% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 111
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 107
7% 107 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Acer(1025 1295) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
2.26% Terrible
Lighting 3.07
Reflection 4.81
Parallax 3.16
2% 3.68 fps
MRender 4.67
Gravity 2.93
Splatting 0.04
2% 2.55 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.26%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Sanal Diski 537GB
461GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 9.9 7 6.8 8.2 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46% Average
Read 150
Write 25.1
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 10.1
41% 55.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 46%
Great: 46%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2013)
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 27 24 25 27 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 81.2
Write 92.3
Mixed 53.5
SusWrite 28.7
47% 63.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G3B1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.2
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 12.3
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 86.7
46% 86.7 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A315-53 Builds (Compare 874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A315-53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback