| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 45.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Dell Precision T3600 |
| Motherboard | Dell Precision T3600 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190625 |
| Uptime | 5.3 Days |
| Run Date | May 22 '20 at 23:12 |
| Run Duration | 133 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 15% |
PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
75.8%
Very good
|
74% 126 Pts
|
50% 397 Pts
|
29% 469 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87
|
45.2%
Average
|
48% 53.6 fps
|
40% 48.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 59 9.5 5.3 42 29 MB/s
|
31.8%
Below average
|
48% 218 MB/s
|
44% 11.6 MB/s
| |
|
WD Red 1TB (2012)-$88
675GB free
Firmware: 0A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 135 137 137 134 138 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
92% 125 MB/s
|
199% 1.5 MB/s
| |
|
OLYMPUS DVR 8GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 MB/s
|
0.99%
Terrible
|
2% 1.45 MB/s
|
9% 0.23 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
91.1%
Outstanding
|
101% 35.5 GB/s
|
40% 13.8 GB/s
|
62% 64.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,863 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples | 1,065x |
| Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples | 448x |
| Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples | 238x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples | 163x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 138x |
| Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples | 117x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $373 |