ECS H61H2-M16

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS H61H2-M16 (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120927
Uptime	6 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 15:16
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-2120-$52 77,810 User benchmarks, average bench 51% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60.7% Good	Memory 84 1-Core 85.7 2-Core 147 64% 105 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 216 29% 218 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz) 150,891 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Elitegroup(1019 7D8B) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.2843 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.79% Terrible	Lighting 0.83 Reflection 1.08 Parallax 0.75 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.38 Gravity 0.6 Splatting 1.57 1% 1.18 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.79% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370 128GB-$74 4,687 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 6GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 244 Write 147 Mixed 41.5 31% 144 MB/s	4K Read 22.6 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 26.6 75% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 146 DQ Mixed 30.4 59% 118 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 83%
WD WD20EURX 2TB-$39 12,609 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 525GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 115 115 119 121 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 104 Write 104 Mixed 58.3 SusWrite 117 70% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 86%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 164GB free Firmware: 0A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 61 64 60 65 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 69 Write 71.2 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 62.7 43% 58.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.4 79% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 59%
Samsung SSD 860 EVO 500G 500GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 465GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	36.3% Below average	Read 32.8 Write 26.5 Mixed 29 SusWrite 27.7 39% 29 MB/s	4K Read 7.7 4K Write 7.7 4K Mixed 7.7 552% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 163%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung V-GeN D3V4GL16B8R 86D3 SP008GLLTU160N02 12GB 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	38.9% Below average	MC Read 13.3 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.1 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.4 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 73.5 54% 73.5 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61H2-M16 Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-M16

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	11x
Core i5-3340Intel $278Bench 66%, 8,792 samples	5x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	3x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	8x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	4x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x

SSD
530 Series 120GBIntel $79Bench 67%, 15,015 samples	3x
AS-128 128GBBench 62%, 36 samples	3x
SU680 256GBAdataBench 76%, 47 samples	3x

RAM
HMT41GU6MFR8C-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 53%, 5,493 samples	7x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	6x
99U5471-034.A00LF 8GBKingstonBench 48%, 200 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363