Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 17 '20 at 06:12
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 88.1
1-Core 116
2-Core 200
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 332
42% 317 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 164
Reflection 182
Parallax 175
134% 174 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 165
Splatting 117
107% 132 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 240GB
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0526A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 323 276 286 288 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 451
Write 398
Mixed 360
SusWrite 294
84% 376 MB/s
4K Read 36.1
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.1
178% 64.7 MB/s
DQ Read 343
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 103
143% 263 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 106%
Great: 113%
Apacer AS340 120GB
69GB free
Firmware: AP211PE0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 204 226 232 295 231 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
80% Excellent
Read 399
Write 167
Mixed 309
SusWrite 237
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 86.1
4K Mixed 28.9
125% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 160
151% 231 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 80%
Great: 91%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
967GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 131 132 129 124 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 160
Write 147
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 127
95% 130 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 100%
JMicron Generic DISK01 10TB
4.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 185 194 194 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
Read 204
Write 191
Mixed 122
SusWrite 188
236% 176 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.3
297% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 91.5%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.BAGQT.C7C0B Kingmax GLLF63F-C6---------- Kingston KHX2133C14/8G 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52% Above average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.6
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 17.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 52%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270F GAMING Builds (Compare 6,198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270F GAMING - $439

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,001
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $380
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback