Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 330 14,119 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	43.4% Average	Memory 64.7 1-Core 45.8 2-Core 87.4 42% 66 Pts	4-Core 130 8-Core 133 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 119 7% 119 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 330M 7,697 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sanyo(144D C06A) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	2.83% Terrible	Lighting 3.23 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 1.31 3% 3.22 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 2.33 Splatting 3.65 3% 4.01 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.83% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 180GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 213 209 208 205 205 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.4% Average	Read 218 Write 204 Mixed 210 SusWrite 210 47% 210 MB/s	4K Read 15.8 4K Write 25 4K Mixed 21.1 64% 20.6 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 152 DQ Mixed 175 130% 172 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 129%
Corsair Survivor 3.0 124GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 93GB free, PID 1a0a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 13 15 15 15 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	8.34% Terrible	Read 26.5 Write 18.2 Mixed 16.7 SusWrite 13.7 24% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 1 54% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.34% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CF8 2x2GB 2,358 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	22.8% Poor	MC Read 7.8 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 8.6 22% 7.77 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.3 16% 5.67 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 22.8% Great: 42%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 49%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 330MNvidiaBench 2%, 7,697 samples	25x
GeForce 310MNvidiaBench 1%, 8,303 samples	8x

RAM
M471B5673FH0-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 25%, 6,000 samples	8x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	4x
M471B5773CHS-CF8 2x2GBSamsungBench 26%, 995 samples	3x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $273