Today's hottest deals

Asus G60JX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus G60JX  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON G60JX
Memory0.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 02:44
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 460-$130
Socket 989, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
45.2% Average
Memory 62.1
1-Core 69.6
2-Core 105
48% 79 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 161
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 360M
Asus(1043 203C) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 6.65
Parallax 2.47
5% 4.96 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 3.57
4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
870GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 38 68 74 90 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 78
Write 109
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 66.3
56% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 71%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
974GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 20 20 20 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
13.8% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 20.1
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 20.3
29% 22 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.8%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AD73I1C1674EV 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
19.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.4 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 122
33% 122 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G60JX Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus G60JX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $246Nvidia RTX 4070 $519Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback