Asus X551MA

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Asus X551MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X551MA
Memory	1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190419
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 13 '20 at 09:28
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N2830 10,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	34.5% Below average	Memory 62 1-Core 22.3 2-Core 43.8 31% 42.7 Pts	4-Core 44.7 8-Core 41.2 6% 43 Pts	64-Core 44.7 3% 44.7 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 37%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 14DD) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.77% Terrible	Lighting 0.77 Reflection 1.04 Parallax 0.88 1% 0.89 fps	MRender 1.67 Gravity 0.73 Splatting 1.39 1% 1.26 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.77% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15 37,154 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 53GB free (System drive) Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 176 48 48 52 56 MB/s Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	39% Below average	Read 246 Write 218 Mixed 226 SusWrite 82.6 43% 193 MB/s	4K Read 19.2 4K Write 33.9 4K Mixed 16.8 69% 23.3 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 16.3 DQ Mixed 21.6 29% 56 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 86%
Hitachi HTS543225A7A384 250GB 2,305 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 84GB free Firmware: ESBOA60W SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 52 55 55 55 55 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Read 51.8 Write 47 Mixed 28.4 SusWrite 53.6 33% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.6 102% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 41%
OCZ-VERT EX3 120GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 69GB free, PID 2567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 130 146 145 146 149 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	131% Outstanding	Read 311 Write 142 Mixed 188 SusWrite 142 241% 196 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 14.5 1,118% 15 MB/s	DQ Read 21 DQ Write 30.3 DQ Mixed 22.6 1,877% 24.6 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 131% Great: 131%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (17^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	16.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 4.9 MC Mixed 6 15% 5.3 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 122 33% 122 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 16.2% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X551MA Builds (Compare 339 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus X551MA

CPU
Celeron N2830IntelBench 29%, 10,608 samples	153x
Celeron N2840IntelBench 28%, 20,923 samples	79x
Celeron N2815IntelBench 27%, 1,028 samples	59x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	339x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	7x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	5x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	136x
ASU16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 20%, 728 samples	50x
AO1L16BC4R1-BQ7S 1x4GBAdataBench 17%, 369 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16