HP EliteBook 2740p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics0.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteBook 2740p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 7007
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '20 at 09:07
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 M 540
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 65.2
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 62.2
45% 66.4 Pts
4-Core 81.8
8-Core 157
14% 119 Pts
64-Core 128
8% 128 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 48%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)
HP(103C 7007) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2900
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.91% Terrible
Lighting 1
Reflection 1.15
Parallax 0.94
1% 1.03 fps
MRender 1.52
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.65
1% 1.31 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.91%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS90 0 120GB SSD
78GB free (System drive), PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 20 20 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 28.1
Write 21.6
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 20.6
31% 23.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 4.7
346% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
22.8% Poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 9.2
22% 7.63 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 5.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 2740p Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 2740p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback