Gigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091104
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 10:46
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5400-$75
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 54.8
1-Core 3.7
2-Core 6.3
20% 21.6 Pts
4-Core 8.7
8-Core 18.1
2% 13.4 Pts
64-Core 5.4
0% 5.4 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1.2GB
Driver: igdumdx32.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2202
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.49% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.56 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.78
0% 0.58 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.49%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
350GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 14 8.7 9.8 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.57% Terrible
Read 14.7
Write 28
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 18.6
17% 22.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 9.57%
Great: 70%
Philips USB Flash Drive 8GB
3GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6 9.3 9 8.6 11 10 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
2.82% Terrible
Read 4.3
Write 3.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 9
9% 6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.82%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
5.51% Terrible
MC Read 1.5
MC Write 0.9
MC Mixed 2
4% 1.47 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.6
SC Mixed 0.1
1% 0.27 GB/s
Latency 144
28% 144 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 5.51%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-G41M-ES2L Builds (Compare 230 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G41M-ES2L

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $129
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback