Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4 (all builds)
Memory	5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090619
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	May 10 '20 at 10:14
Run Duration	290 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	45.1% Average	Memory 72.5 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 52 36% 50.6 Pts	4-Core 106 8-Core 108 14% 107 Pts	64-Core 106 7% 106 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 45.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% EVGA(3842 2639) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.85% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 3.75 4% 4.72 fps	MRender 5.86 Gravity 4.83 Splatting 3.52 4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.85% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 500GB-$61 13,482 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61170RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 120 124 138 138 127 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.1% Good	Read 249 Write 244 Mixed 164 SusWrite 130 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 52.6 4K Mixed 36.7 120% 39.6 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 189 DQ Mixed 184 142% 193 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 119%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 238GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 143 137 145 147 137 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.9% Good	Read 259 Write 246 Mixed 232 SusWrite 140 49% 219 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 58.1 4K Mixed 36.2 119% 40.7 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 196 148% 197 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 124%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 120 118 127 124 117 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Read 150 Write 110 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 120 76% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.6 118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 101%
Toshiba MK2035GSS 200GB-$285 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 106GB free Firmware: KD20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 35 35 34 35 35 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 34.5 Mixed 21.8 SusWrite 34.5 23% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.3 70% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 21%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 1,630 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 58GB free, PID 2322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 58 61 60 58 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 58.5 Write 42 Mixed 38.5 SusWrite 58.8 66% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 48%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 507 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 551GB free, PID 3312 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 128 Write 100 Mixed 60 SusWrite 12.8 91% 75.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 84% 1 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 634GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 12 12 12 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 133 Write 106 Mixed 59.7 SusWrite 12.6 94% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 713 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 484GB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	Read 128 Write 107 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 12.5 93% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 70%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 376 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 1TB free, PID 331a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	26.5% Poor	Read 54.8 Write 96.5 Mixed 55 SusWrite 12.2 75% 54.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.5 194% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 74%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	26.9% Poor	Read 48.5 Write 105 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 12.3 78% 55.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.5 4K Mixed 0.7 215% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.9% Great: 76%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 4TB free, PID 3322 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 12 15 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	25.2% Poor	Read 49 Write 90.5 Mixed 54 SusWrite 12.5 71% 51.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 0.6 192% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.2% Great: 76%
ST4000DM 000-1F2168 4TB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3TB free, PID 1153 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 12 12 13 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	30.2% Below average	Read 150 Write 106 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 12.8 98% 82.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.8% Very poor	MC Read 7 MC Write 4.5 MC Mixed 4.8 16% 5.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 4.8 14% 5 GB/s	Latency 95.8 42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.8% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P35-DS4 Builds (Compare 108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 15%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4

CPU
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	29x
Core2 Duo E6750IntelBench 38%, 9,456 samples	11x
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples	6x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	7x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	5x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	52x
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	18x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16