CMS 7200-5504B

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive88.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemCMS 7200-5504B  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190712
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 21:36
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 578
67% 522 Pts
64-Core 626
39% 626 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Lighting 93.5
Reflection 83.2
Parallax 72.7
76% 83.1 fps
MRender 70.8
Gravity 77.7
Splatting 75.2
61% 74.6 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
147GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 317 334 311 316 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 332
Mixed 296
SusWrite 318
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 35.1
117% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 215
183% 270 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
930GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 211 214 210 212 213 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 163
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 211
123% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 122%
Great: 113%
USB 2.0 Flash Disk 16GB
7GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.3 9.6 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
9.64% Terrible
Read 31.7
Write 9.2
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 9.5
15% 14.3 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
47% 4.2 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 9.64%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT4G4DFS8266.C8FF 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 23.6
78% 27.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 25.9
SC Mixed 23.2
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 65.1
62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5504B Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

System: CMS 7200-5504B

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $475
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback