Asus P8B75-M LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120529
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 19:05
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 83%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 90.7
1-Core 96.1
2-Core 156
70% 114 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 280
32% 251 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
33.2% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 30.6
Parallax 37.9
34% 36.8 fps
MRender 38.6
Gravity 41.1
Splatting 36.1
31% 38.6 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 297 303 304 303 303 303 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Read 409
Write 403
Mixed 339
SusWrite 302
82% 363 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 47.4
156% 53 MB/s
DQ Read 45.1
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 61.4
52% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$33
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 115 115 115 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 112
Write 110
Mixed 63
SusWrite 115
73% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 68%
Generic Flash-Disk 1GB
0GB free, PID 1320
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 5.1 5.2 5.1 5.2 5.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.33% Terrible
Read 15.3
Write 5
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 5
9% 8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
4% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.33%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
51.6% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 16.6
50% 17.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 15.3
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8B75-M LE Builds (Compare 580 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $335
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback