Today's hottest deals

Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock A320M-DVS R4.0  (all builds)
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 17:13
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User EST-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$90
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 61.5
1-Core 89.7
2-Core 180
61% 110 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 578
57% 463 Pts
64-Core 675
42% 675 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
Nvidia(10DE 1324) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (63rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 90.5
Reflection 81.8
Parallax 70.6
74% 81 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 75
Splatting 73.7
59% 72.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T253X1480G 480GB
399GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1024A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 358 381 396 400 399 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Read 439
Write 385
Mixed 345
SusWrite 383
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 81.6
4K Mixed 22.4
106% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 38
86% 171 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 100%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$105
730GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 93 95 94 95 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 86
Write 86
Mixed 61
SusWrite 93.3
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
136% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 57%
WD Ext HDD 1021 200GB
32GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 34 34 34 33 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
15.3% Very poor
Read 37
Write 24.5
Mixed 29
SusWrite 33.7
41% 31 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 15%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
65.8% Good
MC Read 27.6
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 27.4
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 16.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A320M-DVS R4.0 Builds (Compare 785 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asrock A320M-DVS R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $200Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback