Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock B450M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime7.8 Days
Run DateMay 06 '20 at 07:51
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
56.2% Above average
Memory 71.2
1-Core 77.4
2-Core 132
56% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 590
46% 406 Pts
64-Core 1,080
67% 1,080 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 56.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
28.8% Poor
Lighting 35.5
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 31.9
29% 31 fps
MRender 38.5
Gravity 33.8
Splatting 33.2
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
310GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 395 448 455 455 409 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 456
Mixed 429
SusWrite 426
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 72.3
4K Mixed 46
155% 52.2 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 252
194% 262 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 106%
Great: 123%
ST325031 8AS 250GB
30GB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 40 40 40 40 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.2% Poor
Read 38.5
Write 39
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 39.4
50% 36.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 20.2%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
74.2% Very good
MC Read 31
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 29.8
77% 27 GB/s
SC Read 18.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 26.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 98.6
41% 98.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 4,694 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B450M-HDV R4.0 - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $402
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback