Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (58%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
System
MotherboardIntel NUC5i7RYB
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150812
Uptime17.6 Days
Run DateMay 03 '20 at 15:18
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 58%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5557U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
46.5% Average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 57.7
2-Core 111
47% 77.9 Pts
4-Core 163
8-Core 167
22% 165 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6100 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 2057) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5107
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 7.53
Reflection 7.77
Parallax 9.34
6% 8.22 fps
MRender 7.57
Gravity 8.43
Splatting 11.6
8% 9.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 SATA M.2 500GB-$258
233GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 265 286 337 278 332 318 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 356
Write 304
Mixed 284
SusWrite 303
70% 312 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 24.7
4K Mixed 19.9
68% 21.4 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 232
185% 261 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 115%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 1TB
316GB free
Firmware: EMT41B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 279 304 348 288 343 333 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 410
Write 288
Mixed 344
SusWrite 316
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 25.4
88% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 263
204% 283 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 17.9
52% 18.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 12.5
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 25,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback