Today's hottest deals

Apple iMac17,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics31.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive160% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple iMac17,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-B809C3757DA9BB8D
Memory18.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display5120 x 2880 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180925
Uptime3.1 Days
Run DateMay 02 '20 at 05:35
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$85
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 125
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 611
62% 503 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RADEON R9 M395X
Apple(106B 014D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 909 MHz, MLim: 1365 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.30.01.33
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.2% Below average
Lighting 39
Reflection 42
Parallax 48.4
32% 43.1 fps
MRender 43.6
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 30.8
30% 37.6 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM1024G PCIe 1TB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ53A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 813 749 637 594 599 606 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,449
Write 851
Mixed 843
SusWrite 666
212% 952 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 31.1
134% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 624
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 455
341% 463 MB/s
Poor: 113%
This bench: 160%
Great: 209%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x31364B544631473634485A2D314739503220 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 23.1
MC Write 23.8
MC Mixed 19.5
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac17,1 Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac17,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback