Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

TEST
YOUR PC

ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell XPS 8700

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	37.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell XPS 8700 (all builds)
Motherboard	Dell 0KWVT8
Memory	9.1 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150709
Uptime	32.2 Days
Run Date	May 01 '20 at 22:22
Run Duration	195 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790-$104 255,027 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	78.2% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 104 2-Core 192 76% 129 Pts	4-Core 350 8-Core 557 56% 454 Pts	64-Core 558 34% 558 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Nvidia(10DE 1087) 1GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 500 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.12 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	5.75% Terrible	Lighting 7.23 Reflection 7.62 Parallax 8.5 6% 7.78 fps	MRender 5.29 Gravity 7.67 Splatting 6.87 6% 6.61 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.75% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 6 50 55 58 3.6 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.3% Below average	Read 484 Write 381 Mixed 25.8 SusWrite 41.9 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 27 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 1.2 49% 13.6 MB/s	DQ Read 93.7 DQ Write 6.6 DQ Mixed 21.2 23% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.3% Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 87GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 98 90 97 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	54.7% Above average	Read 97.2 Write 104 Mixed 75.5 SusWrite 92.7 68% 92.3 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 223% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 54.7% Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB 21,301 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0911 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 165 153 165 158 159 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 128 Write 111 Mixed 85.7 SusWrite 156 88% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB 33,521 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 7GB free, PID 5575 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 5.4 5.4 5.6 5.6 5.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	5.34% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 4.7 Mixed 11 SusWrite 5.3 11% 9.38 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.8 51% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 5.34% Great: 17%
Toshiba External USB HDD 320GB 349 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 281GB free, PID a004 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 37 34 37 35 36 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Read 39.2 Write 36.5 Mixed 27 SusWrite 34.8 46% 34.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.7 87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 19%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 29GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 3.2 4.3 4.2 4.6 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	5.37% Terrible	Read 19 Write 8.5 Mixed 8.5 SusWrite 4.5 12% 10.1 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 2.3 101% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.37% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,970 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 17GB free, PID 0212 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 54 50 53 51 52 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 50.7 Write 53.7 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 51.4 62% 46 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 KHX1866C10D3/8G Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 24GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1866, 1600, 1866, 1600 MHz 8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	57.3% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 20.9 MC Mixed 16.6 56% 19.5 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 19.9 SC Mixed 19.4 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 64.7 62% 64.7 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 57.3% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical XPS 8700 Builds (Compare 5,302 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8700

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $104Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	2,816x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	1,819x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	216x

GPU
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 26,874 samples	592x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	375x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	341x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	172x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	172x
MX500 1TBCrucial $76Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	162x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples	366x
HMT451U6BFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 56%, 2,366 samples	203x
M378B5173DB0-CK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 3,272 samples	151x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $304

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210	Nvidia RTX 4060 $278	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370