Emaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardEmaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1400 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140813
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 01 '20 at 11:40
Run Duration285 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A4-4000 APU-$171
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
45.1% Average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 51.2
2-Core 79.3
46% 69.2 Pts
4-Core 79.6
8-Core 77.8
10% 78.7 Pts
64-Core 79.3
5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7480D
AMD(1002 0123) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.501.1003.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Lighting 2.77
Reflection 4.12
Parallax 2.25
2% 3.04 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 1.83
Splatting 4.04
3% 3.29 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Disk drive 500GB
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 28 30 29 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Read 26.9
Write 23.4
Mixed 20.3
SusWrite 28.5
18% 24.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.3 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 74%
Disk drive 32GB
22GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 18 1.9 8.8 2.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
14.4% Very poor
Read 29.7
Write 23.7
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 13
30% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 2.9
182% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5584-003.A00LF 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
26.1% Poor
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 5
MC Mixed 8.9
24% 8.4 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 9
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 85.9
47% 85.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Emaxx EMX-A58FM2+HD-ICAFE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $51
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback