Asus M4N68T-M

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	22.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus M4N68T-M (all builds)
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100526
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Apr 30 '20 at 18:16
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T-$175 23,835 User benchmarks, average bench 54% AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	53.8% Above average	Memory 78.4 1-Core 46.2 2-Core 86.3 46% 70.3 Pts	4-Core 160 8-Core 239 25% 200 Pts	64-Core 236 15% 236 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 53.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Gigabyte(1458 3609) 2GB CLim: 1398 MHz, MLim: 1532 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31% Below average	Lighting 36.2 Reflection 33.2 Parallax 41.4 30% 36.9 fps	MRender 44.3 Gravity 44.3 Splatting 38 34% 42.2 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 64 85 43 95 27 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	22.6% Poor	Read 114 Write 79.5 Mixed 69.5 SusWrite 66.1 18% 82.3 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 10.8 44% 13.9 MB/s	DQ Read 12.1 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 14 11% 14.2 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 100%
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 63GB free Firmware: SBFK SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 109 50 51 43 51 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.1% Below average	Read 197 Write 106 Mixed 110 SusWrite 76 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 18.1 4K Write 27.1 4K Mixed 13.1 59% 19.4 MB/s	DQ Read 17.4 DQ Write 28.6 DQ Mixed 16.7 14% 20.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 85%
Sandisk PLUS 480 480GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 364GB free Firmware: UG50 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 94 95 74 14 90 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	25.9% Poor	Read 121 Write 96.5 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 75.1 22% 96.3 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 16.7 4K Mixed 15.5 50% 15.4 MB/s	DQ Read 18.1 DQ Write 17.6 DQ Mixed 18.1 14% 17.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 25.9% Great: 52%
Samsung 860 EVO 250GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 62GB free Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 178 184 186 185 186 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	55% Above average	Read 230 Write 188 Mixed 190 SusWrite 180 44% 197 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 36.9 4K Mixed 32.7 100% 31.8 MB/s	DQ Read 46.1 DQ Write 91.4 DQ Mixed 57.4 47% 65 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 89%
Seagate Expansion 4TB 22,017 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0708 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 10 9.8 9.4 9.5 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	6.7% Terrible	Read 12.5 Write 12.5 Mixed 13 SusWrite 9.6 9% 11.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.2 4K Mixed 0.8 182% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 6.7% Great: 66%
ST350031 2CS 500GB 53 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 140GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 9.1 9 8.9 8.9 8.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	9.12% Terrible	Read 12.7 Write 12.7 Mixed 11.2 SusWrite 8.9 15% 11.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.12% Great: 20%
General USB Flash Disk 4GB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 800f Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.2 1.6 3.2 3.7 3.8 4.4 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	3% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 3.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 3.1 6% 5.17 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 1.6 69% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	MC Read 13.6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 11.6 30% 10.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 8.4 20% 7 GB/s	Latency 83.6 48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4N68T-M Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N68T-M

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	3x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	3x
GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples	3x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	3x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	2x
SS DSA2BW120G3 120GBIntelBench 34%, 12 samples	1x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	7x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	6x
6GBUnknownBench 25%, 111,301 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 34% - Below average

Total price: $131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16