Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateApr 29 '20 at 12:55
Run Duration484 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$449
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.7
1-Core 144
2-Core 299
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 922
93% 756 Pts
64-Core 1,209
75% 1,209 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 103%
Great: 102%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,319
Write 1,044
Mixed 523
212% 962 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 145
4K Mixed 46.9
195% 76.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,051
DQ Write 1,177
DQ Mixed 689
636% 972 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
5GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 468
Write 454
Mixed 378
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 48.9
184% 69 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 360
271% 362 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate BUP SL 5TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0109
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 55
Write 72.3
Mixed 73.5
15% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 0.8
5% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 13%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 8TB
222GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 124 126 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 81.2
Write 107
Mixed 82.2
SusWrite 113
22% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 0.8
7% 3.77 MB/s
DQ Read 1.5
DQ Write 8.6
DQ Mixed 2.6
3% 4.23 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 18%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 8TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.7
Write 93.2
Mixed 68.5
15% 64.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.2
8% 3.9 MB/s
DQ Read 2.2
DQ Write 2.8
DQ Mixed 2.1
2% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 18%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
441GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 160 158 139 148 162 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 150
Write 151
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 151
93% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
111% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 114%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 6TB
6GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 110
Write 154
Mixed 108
93% 124 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.7
303% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 90%
Seagate BUP BK 5TB
447GB free
Firmware: 0109
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 94 88 93 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
42.3% Average
Read 55
Write 66
Mixed 73.8
SusWrite 91.3
53% 71.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
201% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
8GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 126
Write 149
Mixed 83.5
89% 120 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
241% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
455GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 112
Write 141
Mixed 102
89% 118 MB/s
4K Read 7.1
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.7
450% 3.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
230GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 178
Mixed 110
108% 145 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 4.1
4K Mixed 0.9
409% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
98GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 153
Mixed 90.8
94% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.7
230% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
203GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 137
Write 158
Mixed 102
98% 132 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
385% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Expansion 5TB
8GB free
Firmware: 0710
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 77 75 74 76 77 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
38.1% Below average
Read 55.8
Write 69.2
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 75.7
51% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
210% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 38.1%
Great: 67%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
107GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 138
Mixed 98.7
89% 119 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.7
407% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
45GB free
Firmware: D781
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 140
Write 166
Mixed 110
103% 138 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.8
300% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 92%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 8TB
207GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 159 129 127 128 142 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
83.6% Excellent
Read 138
Write 145
Mixed 80.2
SusWrite 144
172% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1
391% 4.07 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 1
424% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 84%
Intenso External USB 3.0 8TB
55GB free, PID 0539
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 115
Write 144
Mixed 79.5
145% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 10.4
4K Mixed 1
391% 4.1 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 1.1
424% 4.3 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D30AESEK.M8FE 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
MC Read 36.5
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 29.9
99% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 40.1
SC Mixed 31
89% 31.2 GB/s
Latency 51.6
78% 51.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING Builds (Compare 10,760 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z370-E GAMING - $210

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,020
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $158
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback