HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	31.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1495
Memory	26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190412
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '20 at 22:53
Run Duration	139 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$84 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 88 1-Core 94.1 2-Core 183 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 415 46% 363 Pts	64-Core 426 26% 426 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3746) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	31.4% Below average	Lighting 39.1 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 36.9 32% 35.5 fps	MRender 38.4 Gravity 37.7 Splatting 35.6 30% 37.2 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.4% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB 23,667 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 162GB free (System drive) Firmware: CA12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 53 69 77 73 74 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	43.2% Average	Read 86 Write 97.2 Mixed 45.5 SusWrite 64.5 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 43.2% Great: 61%
HGST Travelstar 5K1000 2.5" 1TB 129,581 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 739GB free Firmware: JA0O SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 93 92 95 96 95 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	49.1% Average	Read 80.8 Write 78 Mixed 30 SusWrite 90.2 51% 69.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 57%
Generic- Compact Flash 4GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 1GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.4 2.7 2.7 2.4 4.8 5.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.89% Terrible	Read 15.2 Write 3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 3.5 7% 6.5 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.89% Great: 12%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.2% Average	MC Read 15.2 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 13.3 SC Write 15.3 SC Mixed 15.5 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 46.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC Builds (Compare 3,283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8200 Elite SFF PC

CPU
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	1,683x
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples	554x
Core i7-2600Intel $84Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	550x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,776x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	279x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	243x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	125x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	55x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	49x

RAM
9905584-014.A00LF 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 436 samples	38x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 45%, 4,605 samples	37x
M378B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 27%, 3,798 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $278

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $149	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4070 $520	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363