Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Dual Core AMD Opteron 170 15 User benchmarks, average bench 39% Socket 939, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	34.9% Below average	Memory 60.5 1-Core 27.5 2-Core 52.4 32% 46.8 Pts	4-Core 56.1 8-Core 58.5 8% 57.3 Pts	64-Core 50.5 3% 50.5 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 34.9% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 95GB free (System drive) Firmware: BB2OC32P SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 40 40 40 44 42 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	19.5% Very poor	Read 26.9 Write 23.1 Mixed 24.6 SusWrite 41 21% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 87% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 19.5% Great: 31%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB 16,813 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 5GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.2 2.7 3.2 2.9 2.9 2.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	3.62% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 4.2 Mixed 5.2 SusWrite 2.6 8% 7.13 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 3.62% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 4 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	4.97% Terrible	MC Read 0.8 MC Write 1.4 MC Mixed 1 3% 1.07 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 0.6 SC Mixed 0.1 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 126 32% 126 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	1,322x
SVGA 3DVmwareBench 20%, 11,474 samples	1,142x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	1,040x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	823x
Virtual NVMe Disk 64GBVmwareBench 62%, 2,103 samples	457x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	425x

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $325

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16