Koloe X58-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Intel Thurley
Motherboard	Koloe X58-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 16.001 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190731
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Apr 28 '20 at 09:36
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5670 9,061 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 73.9 2-Core 141 61% 99.5 Pts	4-Core 282 8-Core 454 45% 368 Pts	64-Core 544 34% 544 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280-$185 33,175 User benchmarks, average bench 30% MSI(1462 277C) 3GB CLim: 972 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Lighting 43.1 Reflection 31.3 Parallax 53.8 35% 42.8 fps	MRender 29.7 Gravity 42.3 Splatting 38.3 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 34%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Xstar 120GB 120GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 907XKR SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 183 96 20 20 MB/s Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.8% Below average	Read 249 Write 180 Mixed 20 SusWrite 112 31% 140 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 20.2 4K Mixed 0.9 40% 13.2 MB/s	DQ Read 62.6 DQ Write 91.1 DQ Mixed 1.1 22% 51.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 448GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 7 7 7.1 7 6.9 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 649 Write 6.5 SusWrite 7 158% 221 MB/s	4K Read 213 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.8 8,980% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
TOSHIBA MQ01ABF050 500GB 56 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 334GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 27 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Read 32.3 Write 27.2 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 27.1 35% 26.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ST M25P80 49GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 4266, 33 MHz 16384, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	40.8% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.8 MC Mixed 13.4 40% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.4 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 11.6 29% 10.1 GB/s	Latency 73.7 54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 41%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X58-PRO Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 77%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Koloe X58-PRO

CPU
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples	10x
Xeon X5680IntelBench 74%, 4,201 samples	5x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	6x
RTX 3060Nvidia $250Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	3x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	3x

SSD
S3SSDC240 240GBBench 72%, 152 samples	4x
KSS120 120GBBench 60%, 43 samples	2x
IND-S325S120G 120GBBench 52%, 6 samples	2x

RAM
ST M25P80 41GBUnknownBench 37%, 69 samples	20x
M25P80 1x33GBSTBench 22%, 14 samples	3x
ST M25P80 37GBUnknownBench 36%, 25 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $155

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16