Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110308
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 27 '20 at 04:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$173
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 96.2
1-Core 108
2-Core 206
80% 137 Pts
4-Core 340
8-Core 530
54% 435 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 5850
Diamond(1092 E140) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
15.9% Very poor
Lighting 21.9
Reflection 12.7
Parallax 19.9
18% 18.2 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 16.2
Splatting 16.2
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 109 111 108 106 107 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 227
Write 123
Mixed 123
SusWrite 110
32% 146 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 16.8
62% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 66.1
DQ Mixed 61.3
56% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 48%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
453GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 225 227 227 227 229 230 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.8% Good
Read 235
Write 228
Mixed 214
SusWrite 228
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 36
117% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 199
150% 199 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 134%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
400GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 70 70 68 69 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 82.8
Write 75.7
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 69
54% 72.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 97 99 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 106
Write 104
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 97.8
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
58.3% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 18.4
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 53.2
75% 53.2 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 402 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $591
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback