Lenovo 20255

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.28% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20255  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Lenovo G505s
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140108
Uptime14.8 Days
Run DateFeb 01 '17 at 21:48
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-5750M APU
Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 60.5
2-Core 103
53% 81.9 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 171
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 170
10% 170 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8650G
Legend(17AA 397C) 768MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.28% Terrible
Lighting 4.03
Reflection 5.46
Parallax 5.31
3% 4.94 fps
MRender 2.33
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 4.57
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.28%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Voyager GTX 128GB
118GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 332
Write 84.6
Mixed 134
40% 184 MB/s
4K Read 15
4K Write 3.51
4K Mixed 3.88
30% 7.46 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 57%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 390
Write 313
Mixed 313
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 47.9
4K Mixed 19.1
101% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 102
DQ Mixed 50.7
60% 106 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 15.6
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 11
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 10.7
25% 8.9 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20255 Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20255

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback