ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP 550

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	HP 550 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3618
Memory	1 GB free of 2 GB @ 1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 31 '17 at 12:09
Run Duration	81 Seconds
Run User	ROU-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 530 183 User benchmarks, average bench 26% U10, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.75 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 63 1-Core 18.3 2-Core 18.1 27% 33.1 Pts	4-Core 18.1 8-Core 18.7 2% 18.4 Pts	64-Core 17.6 1% 17.6 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba MK1252GSX 120GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 64GB free (System drive) Firmware: LV011C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 1025 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5374 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 4352 (0A) Spinup retry count 207 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 4358 (B8) Unknown 73 73 27 (BB) vendor-specific 73 73 27 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 64 45 606076964 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 125 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 19792174 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 95 95 58819 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 236223201316 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 134 (DE) Loaded hours 92 92 3441 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 345 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	26% Poor	Read 44.3 Write 46.2 Mixed 45.1 34% 45.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.24 4K Mixed 0.18 63% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 26% Great: 31%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	10.6% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 2.5 MC Mixed 3 8% 2.93 GB/s	SC Read 3.2 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 119 34% 119 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback