Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK E752  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB23F
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120524
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 31 '17 at 00:25
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 81.7
1-Core 82.4
2-Core 150
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 187
8-Core 175
24% 181 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3368
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.74% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.72
3% 4.05 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 2.27
Splatting 7.7
4% 5.23 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.74%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
365GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MH00 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 75
Write 77.7
Mixed 78.6
58% 77.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.38
85% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 56%
WDC WD50 00AAKS-75A7B0 500GB
356GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 36.5
Write 38.9
Mixed 18.1
39% 31.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.31
76% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 20%
UFD USB Flash Drive 8GB
7GB free, PID c75c
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.98% Terrible
Read 20.8
Write 7.55
Mixed 9.52
14% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 5.42
4K Write 0.01
4K Mixed 0.01
21% 1.82 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.98%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G3N169ES4.16FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.5
58% 20.4 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 12.7
SC Mixed 15.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK E752 Builds (Compare 126 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK E752

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback