Asus P8P67 EVO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive72.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 EVO  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111130
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 22 '20 at 15:44
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 475
50% 402 Pts
64-Core 474
29% 474 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Asus(1043 83A0) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.95% Terrible
Lighting 2.4
Reflection 2.88
Parallax 1.81
2% 2.37 fps
MRender 2.81
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 2.09
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.95%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 340 319 144 144 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Read 434
Write 326
Mixed 381
SusWrite 236
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 29
98% 34.7 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 228
172% 231 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 95%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
760GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 104 106 109 105 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 108
Write 105
Mixed 57.9
SusWrite 107
69% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.6
118% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 84%
Disk drive 4GB
4GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.4 4.1 3.9 3.8 4.1 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
2.78% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 1
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 3.7
5% 4.62 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
5% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.78%
Great: 5%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
50.3% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 15.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 64.3
62% 64.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50.3%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 EVO Builds (Compare 605 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 EVO - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback