HP ProBook 450 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837D
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190103
Uptime153.9 Days
Run DateApr 19 '20 at 09:36
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8130U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 72.5
1-Core 99.7
2-Core 155
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 212
29% 215 Pts
64-Core 215
13% 215 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
3.51% Terrible
Lighting 3.67
Reflection 8.92
Parallax 3.66
3% 5.42 fps
MRender 5.05
Gravity 3.27
Splatting 7.43
4% 5.25 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 270 266 266 268 301 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 341
Write 291
Mixed 314
SusWrite 276
69% 306 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 78.5
4K Mixed 27.9
114% 43.6 MB/s
DQ Read 222
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 53.4
100% 195 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 102%
Intenso Micro Line 8GB
3GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.4 4.3 5 4.9 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 7.7
Mixed 9
SusWrite 4.7
10% 8.02 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.5% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 13.4
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 95.8
42% 95.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 450 G5 Builds (Compare 1,865 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback