Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VII RANGER  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150827
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJan 28 '17 at 14:27
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User HRV-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790K-$348
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 231
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 630
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
AMD(1002 00D0) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1055.0
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 22.4
Reflection 15.6
Parallax 19.8
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 12.7
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 20.1
14% 16.1 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 522
Write 484
Mixed 498
112% 501 MB/s
4K Read 38.1
4K Write 121
4K Mixed 27.2
157% 62.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 27
96% 209 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 110%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN724040ALE640 2TB
994GB free
Firmware: CC43 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.7% Very good
Read 149
Write 115
Mixed 120
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 0.96
4K Mixed 0.23
78% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 106%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
162GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
57.1% Above average
Read 98.7
Write 99.9
Mixed 101
75% 99.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.64
4K Mixed 0.37
106% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 59%
WD WD10EARS-00Y5B1 3TB
162GB free
Firmware: CC29 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
53.2% Above average
Read 94.1
Write 91.2
Mixed 94.5
70% 93.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.58
4K Mixed 0.35
98% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 106%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
133GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 81.7
Write 84.4
Mixed 85.1
63% 83.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.95
4K Write 1.85
4K Mixed 0.22
99% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 92%
WD My Book Essentials 1TB
619GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 37.1
Write 36.6
Mixed 18.9
38% 30.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.61
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.16
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%
Generic Ultra HS-SD/MMC 64GB
53GB free, PID 4060
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
8.42% Terrible
Read 21.4
Write 12.5
Mixed 12.6
18% 15.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.43
4K Write 0.43
4K Mixed 0.6
55% 2.15 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.42%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 17.5
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 15.3
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,817 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $916
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback