HP 240 G5 Notebook PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 7%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 5.54%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 240 G5 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81E1
Memory2.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 18 '20 at 02:57
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N3060
CHV, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
5.54% Terrible
Memory 7.54
1-Core 12.1
2-Core 19
7% 12.9 Pts
4-Core 21.1
8-Core 18.2
3% 19.7 Pts
64-Core 17.4
1% 17.4 Pts
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.54%
Great: 28%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics
HP(103C 81E1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5126
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1.88
Parallax 2.34
1% 1.91 fps
MRender 1.81
Gravity 1.67
Splatting 2.04
2% 1.84 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
449GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 67 60 73 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 100
Write 80.4
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 66.2
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 82%
Generic- SD/MMC/MS PRO 32GB
25GB free, PID 0177
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 7.6 11 13 5.9 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
6.78% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 14.5
Mixed 11.4
SusWrite 9.8
17% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.9
57% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.78%
Great: 19%
HP v165w 2GB
2GB free, PID 5307
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 6.3 6.4 6.2 6.6 6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
3.2% Terrible
Read 10
Write 5.7
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 6.2
8% 6.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
6% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.2%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP16D3LS1KBGH/4G 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
5.75% Terrible
MC Read 0.3
MC Write 2.6
MC Mixed 2.1
5% 1.67 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 2.7
8% 2.7 GB/s
Latency 427
9% 427 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 5.75%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 240 G5 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 119 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP 240 G5 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback