Asus P5KPL-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5KPL-VM  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100823
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 28 '17 at 01:17
Run Duration619 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3220-$99
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 27.9
2-Core 55.4
36% 51.4 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
45.4% Average
Read 75.9
Write 82
Mixed 28.5
46% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.55
4K Write 2.23
4K Mixed 0.42
111% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 61%
External 500GB
114GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.1% Very poor
Read 27.4
Write 23.7
Mixed 6.05
22% 19.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 0.29
4K Mixed 0.19
18% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 6.5
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 5
15% 5.4 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.13 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KPL-VM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KPL-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $229Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback