Today's hottest deals

Viewsonic ViewPad 10pro

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive12.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemViewsonic ViewPad 10pro  (all builds)
MotherboardViewSonic ViewPad 10pro
Memory1.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 600 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110719
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 68%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Atom Z670
CPU, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
21% Poor
Memory 40.6
1-Core 4.8
2-Core 10.5
16% 18.6 Pts
4-Core 10.7
8-Core 10.6
1% 10.6 Pts
64-Core 10.2
1% 10.2 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 21%
Great: 48%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk P4 32GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SSD 8.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 73 56 51 48 49 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
12.1% Very poor
Read 119
Write 72.8
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 57
15% 69.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.3
14% 3.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HYNIX : 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB Chip DDR2 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
6.36% Terrible
MC Read 2.4
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 1.6
6% 1.9 GB/s
SC Read 1.2
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 0.9
3% 1.2 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.36%
Great: 6%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback