HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics3.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10  (all builds)
MotherboardHPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 13 '20 at 15:56
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Opteron X3216 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
1-Core 53.5
2-Core 63.8
29% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 56.6
8-Core 42.1
7% 49.3 Pts
64-Core 59.4
4% 59.4 Pts
Poor: 20% Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
AMD(1002 1871) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.41% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 4.92
Parallax 6.12
4% 5.15 fps
MRender 2.52
Gravity 4.2
Splatting 4.26
3% 3.66 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.41%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM841 2.5" 7mm 256GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM01D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 126 124 119 118 126 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 309
Write 213
Mixed 198
SusWrite 124
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 17.7
4K Mixed 15.9
49% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 148
DQ Mixed 93.4
87% 134 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 107%
Marvell Raid VD 24TB
22.5TB free
Firmware: MV.R00-0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 327 360 366 414 426 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
197% Outstanding
Read 326
Write 301
Mixed 120
SusWrite 361
201% 277 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 2.4
583% 4 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 197%
Great: 197%
Patriot Memory 32GB
20GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 16 14 17 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 49.5
Write 32
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 14.8
31% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 2.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391A1K43BB1-CRC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
8.31% Terrible
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 1.7
MC Mixed 3
10% 3.4 GB/s
SC Read 0.4
SC Write 1.5
SC Mixed 1.2
3% 1.03 GB/s
Latency 1,834
2% 1,834 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProLiant MicroServer Gen10 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HPE ProLiant MicroServer Gen10

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 27% - Poor Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback